Comprehensive knowledge of the literature of the field is essential to most research papers. Notice that Falk and Mills do quote certain terms that were coined by the author, not common knowledge, or taken directly from the study.
Look at sources the authors cite to in their work.
However, particularly in the social sciences, thinking about research problems from multiple vectors is a key strategy for finding new solutions to a problem or gaining a new perspective.
There are doubtless others that are equally effective, and some of these will be faster, but the approach that I will suggest is one that is thorough and defensible.
Or the review might focus on the fundraising impact of the Internet on a particular political party. And a review does not necessarily mean that your reader wants you to give your personal opinion on whether or not you liked these sources.
Thus, while ambient sexism accounted for some of the masculine bias, sexist language amplified the effect. It may have Methods and Results sections, particularly if you have taken a systemmatic and quantitative approach to your review, or it may be a more narrative review, divided into sections that help you tell the story and elucidate the topic.